I keep coming back to the general gains body building (GGBB) concept. Its a great progression model that takes autoregulation into account while respecting the need for both body building and conditioning as a base. What always rubbed me wrong were two aspects:
- t3 (light sets)
- t2 half sets
I had a lightbulb moment yesterday and needed to write it down.
T3 sets
How I've treated these in the past is their own individual exercise. I cant emphasize this enough, THAT ISNT HOW THE PROGRAM WAS WRITTEN LOL. T3 exercises were meant to be part of a super set with T2 - either the same or opposing muscle group is up to the user.
This can drive a set deeper into stimulation without feeling like i have to go to failure on these Tricep extensions and oh god what am I doing with my life.
Example
T2: Ring dips x11
T3: tricep extension x20 or planche lean x20s
Rest 60-90s
T2 secondary sets with T3 super set
T2 Half Sets
These are exactly what they sound like. After the initial T2 set, the following secondary sets use half volume until the overall volume has doubled. Using the example above:
Ring dips x 11
Ring dips x 5
Ring dips x 5
Ring dips x 5
Ring dips x 5
If in subsequent sessions the primary set is still 11 reps, progression can be made through adding secondary volume.
These secondary sets always felt too far from failure to be useful. Ideas:
- do nothing but how it is written. Adding the t3 into the mix could easily bridge the gap. do this first!
- go for 1 rep in reserve every set regardless of the rep count. The positive here is the increase in failure proximity. The negative is definitely the fatigue and blurry lines in progression. How many sets or volume does one add if the first set fails to move? By default this could be '1xhalf set reps'.
Example
Ring dips x 11 (failure to get 12)
Ring dips x 5
Ring dips x 5
Ring dips x 5
Ring dips x 5
Ring dips x 3-5 (progression set)